營養師黃凱詩的生活點滴

2010年7月2日星期五

點解變咗花面貓?!

營養標籤推行咗1日,有無遇過古怪事呢?

其實如果細心D嘅朋友,應該喺好耐好耐以前,都見過上面張相嘅慘況,吓!點解個招紙好地地,會俾人畫花哂架?!咁會唔會有咩問題呢?

原因有兩個,第一個係,由於現時營養標籤法例,是有小量轄免制度的,若該商品年銷少於3萬件的話,可申請豁免營養標籤,可是若該商品付有營養聲稱,便不可獲得豁免,所以由於以上產品豁免了營養標籤,所以他便不可以有Light/Fat Free等聲稱了。但個人覺得,你都塗得靚仔d吖,咁嘅樣,都幾嚇人架,仲有呀仲有呀!你個營養標籤豁免個貼紙,可唔可以唔好遮住人哋國家個營養標籤先,而家我咩都睇唔倒,好煩。

好! 塗黑營養聲稱嘅另一個原因,係各處鄉村各處例,若果某種外國產品,太多人買,唔可以申請小量豁免,但佢個聲稱又唔合乎香港的要求,咪唯有塗黑佢囉!


4 則留言:

Grace Sze Man 說...

甘塗黑左果d " light or fat free"食品係咪都係light or fat free架?我真係好想知但又唔敢買!

匿名 說...

深有同感,那張大貼紙令致看不到原來的標籤和真面目,不知如何判斷,便不敢買。

WS

Mavis_T 說...

我想問下呢..而架好流行既Acti-V你覺得ok嗎?因爲我留意到拒有成差唔多15g既糖.每日唔係只可以食最多30咋咩???

匿名 說...

i agree with you, don't like that big sticker covering the original nutrition facts

by the way, may I ask one question? I saw many products claiming to contain Omega 3 today are also removed by our Hong Kong local stores (such as oatmeal, flaxseeds...) Why is that??