營養標籤推行咗1日，有無遇過古怪事呢？其實如果細心D嘅朋友，應該喺好耐好耐以前，都見過上面張相嘅慘況，吓!點解個招紙好地地，會俾人畫花哂架?!咁會唔會有咩問題呢?
原因有兩個，第一個係，由於現時營養標籤法例，是有小量轄免制度的，若該商品年銷少於3萬件的話，可申請豁免營養標籤，可是若該商品付有營養聲稱，便不可獲得豁免，所以由於以上產品豁免了營養標籤，所以他便不可以有Light/Fat Free等聲稱了。但個人覺得，你都塗得靚仔d吖，咁嘅樣，都幾嚇人架，仲有呀仲有呀!你個營養標籤豁免個貼紙，可唔可以唔好遮住人哋國家個營養標籤先，而家我咩都睇唔倒，好煩。
好! 塗黑營養聲稱嘅另一個原因，係各處鄉村各處例，若果某種外國產品，太多人買，唔可以申請小量豁免，但佢個聲稱又唔合乎香港的要求，咪唯有塗黑佢囉!
留言
WS
by the way, may I ask one question? I saw many products claiming to contain Omega 3 today are also removed by our Hong Kong local stores (such as oatmeal, flaxseeds...) Why is that??